While any failure of a rocket is unfortunate, the failure of a rocket nominally designed to launch humans can have even worse repercussions. maybe the nozzle fell apart?!? /OOzPkPiX6G- Flo September 12, 2022 there is room for a lot of speculation □– i did a frame by frame Picture – on the bottom row you can see some parts falling away. Had a crew of suborbital tourists been aboard, they would have likely been a little battered but otherwise completely unharmed. Thankfully, NS-23 was only carrying experiments, and no humans were at risk. The capsule ultimately coasted to an apogee of 11.4 kilometers (7.1 miles) – almost ten times lower than nominal – before descending back to Earth, deploying its parachute system, and safely touching down in the Texas desert scrub. Less than a second after that, the rocket’s aft and began shedding pieces and stopped producing thrust, triggering a solid rocket motor stored inside its deployable capsule.Ībout a second after the incident began, the capsule’s abort motor ignited and carried the suborbital spacecraft safely away from the failing New Shepard booster. Less than two seconds after the first seemingly harmless flash, flames unintentionally burst from New Shepard’s engine section and quickly surrounded its BE-3PM engine. The first signs of trouble appeared about 62 seconds after liftoff in the form of flickers and flashes in New Shepard’s exhaust, which is normally almost transparent. B7JSvKtEya- Chris Bergin – NSF September 12, 2022 ABORT! New Shepard failed during first stage ascent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |